

similiar like how ea implemented the lootboxes into Battlefront 2(where it is already arguable to begin with, if not even Lootboxes are dumb to begin with). Don't get me wrong, in general i love this Game, and i understand many other examples of (true) Singleplayer-Games where an (forced) Multiplayer was unnecassary and bad, but for me personal at my viewpoint, it was one of the dumbest decision i've ever seen done by an developer. only incomplete.Īnd that's how i feel towards Ravenfield. i mean a car without an engine won't be automatically a bike, it still will be an Car. It's an Multiplayer Game with Bots, only missing the possibility to play with other people. I mean sure, in the sense of you playing alone and can't play with others -> that's true, but except there is nothing which quality the Game as an "true" singleplayer Game. However to call it an Singleplayer Game is wrong either.

Don't get me wrong, i don't want to start an Argument here, and also i understand / know, that it is now too late anyway. On the Steam Store page, it also states that it is supposed to be an easy to pick up "singleplayer game". Originally posted by hootie420:why make a mod when the dev can just put it in the gameīecause there's a very long pinned thread stating that multiplayer will not happen.
